[1]杨海龙,樊晓一,裴向军,等.地形因子对偏转型滑坡-碎屑流运动参数的影响[J].水文地质工程地质,2019,46(3):129.[doi:10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2019.03.18]
 YANG Hailong,FAN Xiaoyi,PEI Xiangjun,et al.Influence of terrain factors on the motion parameters of the turning-type landslide-debris flow[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2019,46(3):129.[doi:10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2019.03.18]
点击复制

地形因子对偏转型滑坡-碎屑流运动参数的影响()
分享到:

《水文地质工程地质》[ISSN:1000-3665/CN:11-2202/P]

卷:
46卷
期数:
2019年3期
页码:
129
栏目:
环境地质
出版日期:
2019-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Influence of terrain factors on the motion parameters of the turning-type landslide-debris flow
文章编号:
1000-3665(2019)03-0129-09
作者:
杨海龙1樊晓一23裴向军1裴钻1
1.成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都610059;2.西南科技大学土木工程与建筑学院,四川 绵阳621010;3.工程材料与结构冲击振动四川省重点实验室,四川 绵阳610041
Author(s):
YANG Hailong1 FAN Xiaoyi23 PEI Xiangjun1 PEI Zuan1
1.State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu, Sichuan610059, China; 2.School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan621010, China; 3.Shock and Vibration of Engineering Meterials and Structures key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Mianyang, Sichuan610041, China
关键词:
偏转型沟谷滑坡地形敏感度视摩擦系数前缘速度
Keywords:
deflection-valley landslide terrain sensitivity analysis apparent friction coefficient mass-front velocity
分类号:
P642.22
DOI:
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
根据滑坡地形特征,将沟谷偏转型滑坡划分为坡脚偏转型、凹面偏转型和凸面偏转型三种类型,其主要地形参数为滑源区坡度、斜坡坡度、沟谷坡度和偏转角度。通过数值模拟,采用正交分析、极差分析和方差分析初步探讨主要地形参数对沟谷偏转型滑坡运动参数的影响。结果表明:沟谷偏转型滑坡的视摩擦系数、前缘速度恢复系数均主要受地形起伏的影响。斜坡坡度对视摩擦系数的影响最大,沟谷坡度次之,偏转角度最小;斜坡坡度、沟谷坡度对前缘速度恢复系数的影响大于偏转角度的影响。斜坡坡度是视摩擦系数的显著性因素,斜坡坡度、沟谷坡度是前缘速度恢复系数的显著性因素。视摩擦系数、前缘速度恢复系数与主控地形因子之间存在显著的非线性关系,可分别用二次函数、二次型函数进行描述。
Abstract:
According to the terrain features of landslides, the deflection-valley landslides are divided into three types, including the slope turning-type, concave turning-type and steep slope turning-type. The main terrain parameters are slope of sliding source area, slope gradient, lengthwise grade slope of valley and deflection angle. Through numerical simulation, influence of main terrain parameters on the movement parameters of deflection-valley landslides are preliminarily examined by the orthogonal analysis, the difference analysis and the analysis of variance. The results show that the apparent friction coefficient and mass-front velocity recovery coefficient are mainly affected by the topographic relief. The slope gradient has the greatest influence on the apparent friction coefficient, and the lengthwise grade slope of valley is the second, and the deflection angle is the smallest. The slope gradient and lengthwise grade slope of valley have the greatest influence on the mass-front velocity recovery coefficient, and the deflection angle is the smallest. The slope gradient is the significant factor for the equivalent friction coefficient, and the slope gradient and valley gradient are the significant factors for the mass-front velocity recovery coefficient. There is a significant nonlinear relationship among the apparent friction coefficient, the mass-front velocity recovery coefficient and the decisive terrain factors, which can be described using the quadratic function and the quadratic form function, respectively.

参考文献/References:

[1]樊晓一, 田述军, 段晓冬, 等.地形因子对坡脚型地震滑坡运动参数的影响研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014,33(增刊2):4056-4066.
[FAN X Y, TIAN S J, DUAN X D, et al. Study of topography factors influence on motion parameters for seismic slope-toe landslides[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(Sup2):4056-4066.(in Chinese)]
[2]樊晓一, 冷晓玉, 段晓冬.坡脚型与偏转型地震滑坡运动距离及地形因素作用[J].岩土力学2015, 36(5):1380-1388.
[FAN X Y, LENG X Y, DUAN X D, et al. Influence of topographical factors on movement distances of toe-type and turning-type landslides triggered by earthquake[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(5): 1380-1388.(in Chinese)]
[3]樊晓一, 乔建平.“坡”、“场”因素对大型滑坡运动特征的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(11):2337-2347.
[FAN X Y, QIAO J P. Influence of landslide and ground factor on large-scale landslide movement. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(12):2337-2347.(in Chinese)]
[4]李骅锦, 许强, 何雨森. 等. 甘肃黑方台滑坡滑距参数的BP神经网络模型[J].水文地质工程地质, 2016, 43(4):141-146,152.
[LI H J, XU Q, HE Y S, et al. BP neural network model for analyzing the impact factors of the travel distance of the Heifangtai landslide in Gansu[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2016, 43(4):141-146,152.(in Chinese)]
[5]樊晓一, 杨海龙, 田述军, 等.滑坡-碎屑流运动参数影响因素敏感度研究[J]. 山地学报, 2016, 34(6):724-731.
[FAN X Y, YANG H L, TIAN S J, et al. Susceptibility degree of factors influence on the movement parameters of landslide-debris flow[J]. Mountain Research, 2016, 34(6): 724-731.(in Chinese)]
[6]赵运会, 樊晓一.基于正交设计的滑坡运动参数模型试验[J].山地学报, 2016, 34(1): 92-99.
[ZHAO Y H, FAN X Y. Model Test of Movement Parameters of Landslide Based on orthogonal Design[J]. Mountain Research, 2016 34(1): 92-99.(in Chinese)]
[7]CHEN H R, KUO K J, CHEN YN, et al. Model tests for studying the failure mechanism of dry granular soil slopes. Engineering Geology, 2011, 119: 51-63.
[8]FAN X Y, TIAN S J, ZHANG Y Y. Mass-front velocity of dry granular flows influenced by the angle of the slope to the runout plane and particle size gradation[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2016,13 (2): 234-245.
[9]毕钰璋, 付跃升, 何思明, 等 牛眠沟地震滑坡碎屑化全过程离散元模拟[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2015,26(3):17-25.
[BI Y Z, FU Y S, HE S M, et al. Simulation of the whole process of Niumiangou creek rock avalanche triggered by the earthquake using distinct element method[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2015, 26(3):17-25.(in Chinese)]
[10]曾耀勋, 樊晓一, 段晓冬. 坡脚型场地对滑体运动减速机制研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014, 34(4): 193-196.
[ZENG Y X, FAN X Y, DUAN X D. Deceleration mech-anism of slope foot site to landslide movement[J]. Bulletin of soil and water conservation, 2014, 34(4): 193-196.(in Chinese)]
[11]罗锋, 柴波, 方恒, 等. 顺层岩质滑坡运动过程数值模拟研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2016,43(3): 124-130.
[LUO F, CHAI B, FANG H, et al. Numerical simulation of the bedding rock landslide motion process[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2016, 43(3):124-130.(in Chinese)]
[12]樊晓一, 李天话, 田述军, 等.非完全受阻地震滑坡运动距离的影响因素及机制分析[J]. 地震地质,2017,39(4):754-767.
[FAN X Y, LI T H, TIAN S J, et al. Study of factors and mechanism influence on distances for in-complete obstruction seismic landslide[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2017, 39(4): 754-767.(in Chinese)]
[13]曾耀勋. 场地条件对滑坡运动作用机制研究[D]. 绵阳:西南科技大学, 2014.
[ZENG Y X. Study of the ground condition influence on the movement of landslide[D]. Mianyang: Southwest university of science and technology, 2014.(in Chinese)]
[14]李天话, 樊晓一, 姜元俊. 岩土体颗粒级配对滑坡碎屑流冲击作用的影响研究[J]. 山地学报, 2018, 36(2): 289-297.
[LI T H, FAN X Y, JIANG Y J. Study on the influence of gradation on the impact effect of landslide-debris flow[J]. Mountain Research, 2018, 36(2): 289-297.(in Chinese)]
[15]王云霞, 梁志杰, 张东兴, 等.基于离散元的玉米种子颗粒模型种间接触参数标定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016,32(22):36-42.
[WANG Y X, LIANG Z J, ZHANG D X, et al. Calibration method of contact characteristic para-meters for corn seeds based on EDEM[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016,32(22): 36-42.(in Chinese)]
[16]黄润秋, 刘卫华. 基于正交设计的滚石运动特征现场试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(5): 882-891.
[HUANG R Q, LIU W H. In-situ test study of characteristics of rolling rock blocks based on orthogonal design[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(5):882-891.(in Chinese)]

相似文献/References:

[1]孙萍,殷跃平,陈立伟,等.汶川地震区东河口滑坡破坏机制FLAC模拟分析[J].水文地质工程地质,2011,38(5):87.
[2]孙健,陶慧,杨世伟,等.皖南山区地质灾害发育规律与防治对策[J].水文地质工程地质,2011,38(5):98.
 SUN Jian,TAO Hui,YANG Shi-wei,et al.Development characteristics and prevention measures of geological hazards in mountain area of southern Anhui Province[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2011,38(3):98.
[3]唐亚明,张茂省,李林,等.滑坡易发性危险性风险评价例析[J].水文地质工程地质,2011,38(2):125.
 TANG Ya-ming,ZHANG Mao-sheng,LI Lin,et al.Discrimination to the landslide susceptibility,hazard and risk assessment[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2011,38(3):125.
[4]唐亚明,张茂省.滑坡风险评价难点及方法综述[J].水文地质工程地质,2011,38(2):130.
 TANG Ya-ming,ZHANG Mao-sheng.Landslide risk assessment difficulties and methods:an review[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2011,38(3):130.
[5]徐毅青,唐益群,李献勇,等.改进欧拉算法的GM(1,1)模型预测滑坡变形[J].水文地质工程地质,2011,38(1):110.
 XU Yi-qing,TANG Yi-qun,LI Xian-yong,et al.The landslide deformation prediction with improved Euler Method of Gray System Model GM(1,1)[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2011,38(3):110.
[6]王念秦,樊珂奇.滑坡灾害稳定度综合评判模型[J].水文地质工程地质,2011,38(1):114.
 WANG Nian-qin,FAN Ke-qi.A comprehensive evaluation model for the stability of landslide hazard[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2011,38(3):114.
[7]张茂省,董英,孙萍萍,等.基于水位的赵家岸滑坡风险分析与控制[J].水文地质工程地质,2011,38(1):123.
 ZHANG Mao-sheng,DONG Ying,SUN Ping-ping,et al.Risk analysis and control of the Zhaojiaan landslide through controlling water levels[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2011,38(3):123.
[8]薛强,张茂省,唐亚明,等.基于DEM的黑方台焦家滑坡变形分析[J].水文地质工程地质,2011,38(1):133.
 XUE Qiang,ZHANG Mao-sheng,TANG Ya-ming,et al.Deformation analysis of the Jiaojia landslide at Heifang platform based on DEM[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2011,38(3):133.
[9]洪勇,商志红.日本结晶片岩滑坡的活动特点及与降雨的关系[J].水文地质工程地质,2010,37(2):99.
 HONG Yong,SHANG Zhi-hong.Characteristics of the activities of Crystalline Schist Landslide of Japan and the relation with rainfall[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2010,37(3):99.
[10]尉学勇,蔡庆娥,刘卫民,等.抗滑刚架桩挡墙的设计与应用[J].水文地质工程地质,2010,37(4):68.
 YU Xue-yong,CAi Qing-e,LIU Wei-min,et al.Design and application of retaining wall with anti-sliding frame piles[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2010,37(3):68.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2018-07-30; 修订日期: 2018-10-19
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(41572302;41877524);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC1501002);工程材料与结构冲击振动四川省重点实验室项目(18kfgk10)
第一作者: 杨海龙(1992-),男,博士研究生,主要从事地质灾害及地质工程研究。E-mail: yhl826325@126.com
通讯作者: 樊晓一(1974-),男,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程及地质灾害方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: xyfan1003@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-05-15